Health in the News

Read the latest health news from the various health sections of the BBC, NPR, NY Times, TIME Magazine, and others collected on Digg.com. Also don't forget to visit Medpedia at www.medpedia.com.

BBC News - Health Section

The latest health news from the health section of the BBC News.

Digg.com - Health Articles

The most recent health articles on Digg.com.

Medpedia

Medpedia - the Wikipedia for health and medicine.

New York Times - Health Section

The latest health news from the health section of the New York Times.

NPR - Health and Science

The latest health and science news from National Public Radio.

TIME - Health and Science Section

The latest health and science news from TIME, partnered with CNN.

Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts

Widespread Misunderstanding of Drugs & Vaccines

Posted by YO On 3/28/2010 10:56:00 PM 1 comments
Example 1. Control of Tuberculosis (TB)

Pharmacy Student Friend: Did you hear about that multi-drug resistant type? It's so scary. We need new, better drugs, that's the problem.


Example 2. HIV Vaccine?

Given all of the structural and behavioral barriers to eradication of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, more than one of my professors who extensively research this topic voiced their hopes for an HIV vaccine entering the market some day.

.........

As much as I support biomedical research, I have come to understand that drugs and vaccines are definitely not the simple solutions that everyone thinks (wishes) they are.

For one thing, it is ABSURD to appropriate all of the government funding into drug innovations and ignore public health infrastructure, as a certain previous administration has done.


Bacteria are genetically capable of evolving at alarming rates. Every antibiotic ever introduced into the market has successfully selected for its corresponding resistant strains. The scary part is that the lag time between introduction of a new drug and the appearance of resistant strains has been getting shorter with time (1900s - present). Which means, new TB drugs alone can't save us from Multi-drug resistant strains. They will only create a period of peace until the next resistant strains show up, however soon that may be...

Viruses, on the other hand, are notorious for genetic variation. Some of the vaccines we currently use to prevent certain diseases will only protect against several, but not all, of the subtypes of pathogenic virus. Our struggles with Influenza illustrate the limits of human capability to battle viral mutation rates. HIV also has many subtypes, for which their distribution varies among geographical locations. How many vaccines would we need to develop, and how fast would those become available (long years of testing)? Would there be risks of developing disease from the vaccine itself?


What should we be doing instead?

At least for the above TB example, the answer lies in the need for better drug adherence. Chances of bacterial resistance developing to a certain drug is much lower if patients rigidly follow their drug regimens. The most effective method for this has been Direct Observed Therapy, where health workers physically watch patients as they take their drugs. There are challenges to implementing this practice widely, but it is an important investment to make if we are to keep multi-drug resistant TB out of our hair (and it may prove more rewarding than the costs involved in making new drugs).

And as for an HIV vaccine, there has been VERY limited success in that end of research. Treatment for AIDS has also hit the drug resistance obstacle many times.


Anyways, my point is that drugs and vaccines are great, but they should not be the only focus of intervention efforts.

Vaccine blurb: Varicella

Posted by YO On 2/28/2010 11:03:00 PM 2 comments

me: I heard I had chicken pox as a baby, even before I left the hospital.

friend A: That's really good, you didn't have to even suffer through it, or at least have any memories.

friend B: My mom made me play with the neighbor's kids when they got it, so that I would get it too. I mean, they used to have 'chicken pox parties' in my neighborhood, where everyone's kids would be sure to get it.


That was then, this is now. In today's America we have the Varicella vaccine on the recommended immunization schedule, so that most kids are vaccinated by the time they're in grade school, and the entire itchy experience is bypassed.

This is with good reason, because chickenpox tends to be more severe if people get it later on in life. Although, even after immunity to chickenpox develops, the virus itself is never cleared, and can manifest as shingles sometime later. I'm sure you personally know someone who's had either or both types of disease. Shingles can be extremely painful, and can cause blindness if it occurs on the face.

But fear not! I hear there now is a shingles vaccine.

Moral of the story: Some vaccines you can do perfectly fine without, but do get protected from chickenpox. Spare yourself (and people around you, as it is extremely contagious) any distress it could cause. It may seem like the disease is subsiding. That would probably be because everyone is just immune. But for the people who are not immune, it still can be a potentially deadly disease.